RSS
 

Reality Checks, Fact Checks, and Health Care

10 Aug

For a great piece of satire, or maybe irony… Or maybe he’s going for reverse-psychology… Check out this Newsweek article by Jonathan Alter. One paragraph that really jumped out at me, illustrating how people blindly and ignorantly resist change:

I’m with that woman who wrote the president complaining about “socialized medicine” and added: “Now keep your hands off my Medicare.” That’s the spirit!

People’s blind ignorance can be just as bad as their blind faith!

The White House has taken a little initiative and started a new program called Reality Check – a resource “to help you separate fact from fiction and share the truth about health insurance reform.” Here’s the highlights from their first distribution:

The White House also has a blog post out countering the claims that an “uncovered video” shows proof that Obama wants to eliminate private health insurance.

FactCheck.org took notice that the White House has decided to jump into the industry; and they have pledged to continue their fine work, and Fact Check the Reality Check.

Fact Check does have a few recent health care or health insurance related posts worth checking if you are interested:

Finally, I’d like to relay some great points from a blog post I Stumbled Upon.

  • All the people in the industry know it needs reformed; but none of them have any personal incentive to initiate reform. Unfortunately that leaves “a regulatory entity with the rule of law (i.e. the government)” as the only one powerful enough to initiate reform.
  • This truly is not “government health care” but “government health insurance” – and too few realize this, or even know the difference.
    The argument of “Do I want a government bureaucrat deciding if I get [insert medical care here]?” is complete bull.

    The question with government health insurance will not be if you can get the care you want, but who will pay for the care. Same as today, you’ll still have the option to go outside your coverage and pay for it out of pocket yourself.

  • The government is already running a health insurance program: “46% of health care is currently paid for by government insurance policies known as Medicare and Medicaid.”
  • The current path (if there is no reform) is illogical, destructive to the economy, and immoral.
 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

 
 
  1. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 7:19

    In addition to the “government run health insurance” of Medicare and Medicaid; the government also runs one of the best health insurance programs in the US: Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB).

     
  2. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 7:20

    Medicare, the federal health insurance program for the elderly and the disabled, covers 46 million Americans. Medicare spending totaled $455 billion in 2008.

    Source: Kaiser Family Foundation

     
  3. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 7:25

    There He Goes Again: Obama’s False $6,000 Claim

    August 11, 2009 – Jess Henig
    At a nationally televised “town hall meeting” in Portsmouth, N.H., today, President Obama repeated a claim about health care that we’ve disputed in the past.

    Obama: So we want – if I’m a customer, if I’m a consumer and I know that I’m overpaying $6,000 for anything else, I would immediately want the best deal. But for some reason, in health care, we continue to put up with getting a bad deal. We’re paying $6,000 more than any other advanced country and we’re not healthier for it – $6,000 per person more, per year. That doesn’t make any sense.

    He used the same $6,000 figure in his health care news conference on July 22. At the time, we said he was exaggerating the discrepancy between U.S. spending on health care and that of other nations. Today, Obama went beyond misleading to false when he said that the amount is “$6,000 per person more, per year.”

    In the July 22 news conference Obama said “we’re spending on average, we here in the United States are spending about $6,000 more than other advanced countries” on health care, but he didn’t specify whether he was speaking of spending per person, per family or per household. The White House told us that Obama’s figure was based on spending per family, not per person. The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development produces definitive figures about health care spending but doesn’t actually offer an estimate of per-family spending. White House officials said they had done their own calculations to arrive at a figure of $6,000 per family.

    In fact, the U.S. spends about $7,000 per person per year in total, according to OECD figures. We spend about $2,500 more per person than the next highest-spending country, not $6,000.

     
  4. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 7:26

    The Investor’s Business Daily, — while ranting about not wanting the horrible government run health care like Canada and the U.K. — said “People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn’t have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.”

    It didn’t take long for someone to point out that Hawking is British; so the statement has been remove from the article.

     
  5. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 7:48

    Urban Institute, Jan. 2008: In 2002, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) estimated that 18,000 Americans died in 2000 because they were uninsured. Since then, the number of uninsured has grown. Based on the IOM’s methodology and subsequent Census Bureau estimates of insurance coverage, 137,000 people died from 2000 through 2006 because they lacked health insurance, including 22,000 people in 2006.

    [SOURCE]

     
  6. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 10:21

    The Commonwealth Fund says that “individual health insurance market is not a viable option for the majority of uninsured adults.” A new report from The Commonwealth Fund assessed the numbers from the past three years.

    • 73% of people who looked into purchasing individual health insurance did not purchase any; the primary reason was that premiums were too high.
    • 57% who bought found it very difficult to find affordable coverage.
    • 47% who bought found it very difficult to find adequate coverage.
    • 36% were turned down, or charged a significantly higher premium due to a pre-existing condition.
     
  7. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 10:28

    In 2003…
    5% of people with employer insurance had deductibles of $1000+
    29% of people with individual insurance had deductibles of $1000+

    In 2007…
    11% of people with employer insurance had deductibles of $1000+
    39% of people with individual insurance had deductibles of $1000+

    [SOURCE]

     
  8. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 10:36

    Obama Wrong on AARP Endorsement

    August 11, 2009 – Lori Robertson
    At his town hall event in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, President Obama went too far in claiming the support of AARP:
    Obama: We have the AARP on board because they know this is a good deal for our seniors.
    . . .
    [A]nother myth that we’ve been hearing about is this notion that somehow we’re going to be cutting your Medicare benefits. We are not. AARP would not be endorsing a bill if it was undermining Medicare, okay?

    But AARP, while in support of overhauling the health care system, hasn’t endorsed any bill. AARP Chief Operating Officer Tom Nelson issued a statement, saying: “While the President was correct that AARP will not endorse a health care reform bill that would reduce Medicare benefits, indications that we have endorsed any of the major health care reform bills currently under consideration in Congress are inaccurate.”

    Nelson said AARP had been “working with Democrats and Republicans to fix our broken health care system” and added: “We share the President’s commitment to act this year, and our members appreciate his insistence that any final reform package will not reduce Medicare benefits for the millions of people that literally depend on that program as a lifeline.”

    A hat tip to ABC News’ Political Punch blog for writing about this claim.

     
  9. Johnny

    12 August 09 at 10:39

    The Federal Employee Health Benefits Program, which contracts with 111 health plans and offers 269 health plan options, covers approximately 8 million federal employees, retirees and their dependents.

    Source: Office of Personnel Management

     
  10. Johnny

    13 August 09 at 10:00

    In an attempt to combat the misinformation, the White House has sent out an email they are hoping will go viral. The email is comprised of:

    • 8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage
    • 8 common myths about health insurance reform
    • 8 Reasons We Need Health Insurance Reform Now

    If you haven’t seen it, and are interested in the full email, I posted it in a new blog post.

     
  11. Johnny

    13 August 09 at 10:57

    Heath Insurance Whistle-Blower: “I know from personal experience that members of Congress and the public have good reason to question the honesty and trustworthiness of the insurance industry.”

     
  12. Johnny

    17 August 09 at 11:19

    Does the House bill call for mandatory counseling on how to end seniors’ lives sooner? Absolutely not. Will the government be dictating to doctors how to treat their patients? No. Do the bills propose cutting Medicare benefit levels? No on that one, too.

    But on the other hand, has Congress figured out how to pay for this overhaul? Not yet. Or will it really save families $2,500 a year as the president keeps claiming? Good luck on that one, too.

    Seven Falsehoods About Health Care

    1. False: Government Will Decide What Care I Get
    2. False: The Bill Is Paid For
    3. False: Private Insurance Will Be Illegal
    4. False: The House Bill Requires Suicide Counseling
    5. False: Families Will Save $2,500
    6. False: Medicare Benefits Will Be Slashed
    7. False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered
     
  13. Johnny

    17 August 09 at 11:20

    Associated Press Q&A article about ‘Death Panels’

    +++++ +++++ +++++ +++++ +++++

    More on “Death Panels” and Palin’s Idiocy

    Section 1233 of H.R. 3200, which is titled “Advance Care Planning Consultation” [...] modifies Section 1861(s)2 of the Social Security Act, defining what services Medicare will pay for. So if a patient receives a counseling session from a doctor or health care practitioner, he or she doesn’t have to pay for it – Medicare will.

    [Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia said] “I just had a phone call where someone said Sarah Palin’s web site had talked about the House bill having death panels on it where people would be euthanized. How someone could take an end of life directive or a living will as that is nuts. You’re putting the authority in the individual rather than the government. I don’t know how that got so mixed up.”

     
  14. Johnny

    17 August 09 at 11:22

    NPR has an article indicating Obama and the White House may be dropping the “public government-run plan” and opting for a “cooperative membership-run plan.”

     
  15. Johnny

    17 August 09 at 11:51

    British like their healthcare, don’t care what you think

    Seeking to play up this groundbreaking “Be frightened of England” angle, the Republican National Committee ran a web ad warning, “In Great Britain, individuals lose their right to make their own health care choices.” The Club for Growth, a conservative group, has a spot claiming that British bureaucrats pegged the value of six months of life at $22,750. “Under their socialized system, if your treatment costs more, you’re out of luck,” the ad’s narrator says as the spot cuts back and forth from weeping elderly people to Big Ben and the British flag.

    In the U.K., the National Health Service (NHS) plays approximately the political role that Social Security does here. Sure, it may have been controversial to establish: Although Winston Churchill helped lay the groundwork for the NHS, he also warned during the 1945 campaign that the Labour Party’s welfare state ideas would require “some kind of Gestapo” to administer. (Sound familiar?)

    Even David Cameron, the head of the Conservative Party and leader of the opposition, has felt compelled to declare, “I support the NHS 100 percent and the Conservative Party supports the NHS 100 percent.”

    The GOP really ought to have been more careful about this. If you’re going to use another country’s policy as a foil, you first might want to check to make sure that policy is not, in fact, overwhelmingly popular. And if you really want to go ahead with it even then, probably best to pick a country that doesn’t speak English.